OBJECTIVE:To discuss outcomes data assessing the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors
and calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) in the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic
stable angina that have been published since the 2002 American College of Cardiology/American Heart
Association (ACC/AHA) updated guidelines for the treatment of chronic stable angina.
DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (2002–April 2006) identified 60 primary, review, and meta-analysis
articles. The inclusion criteria were: patients with stable coronary artery disease, chronic stable angina, or
coronary heart disease; evaluation of long-term therapy with either ACE inhibitor or CCB therapy;
prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials; cardiovascular events as the primary endpoint of the
study; and date of publication after the 2002 ACC/AHA guidelines. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All articles identified from the literature search were evaluated, and all
clinical trials deemed relevant were included in this review. Six randomized trials met inclusion criteria and
evaluated the utility of ACE inhibitor and CCB therapy in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with
coronary artery disease and/or chronic stable angina.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Patient populations, background therapy, and the study endpoints of all 6 trials varied.
However, all primary endpoints assessed cardiovascular events. Two of the 3 ACE inhibitor trials
demonstrated a significant reduction in the primary endpoint and 1 of the 3 CCB trials demonstrated a
significant reduction in the primary endpoint.
CONCLUSIONS: Newer evidence cumulatively supports the addition of an ACE inhibitor to standard
antianginal pharmacotherapy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. However, benefit is influenced by
severity of illness and use of additional cardiovascular risk reduction pharmacotherapy. The level of
supporting evidence for ACE inhibitor therapy in chronic stable angina is higher than that cited in the 2002
ACC/AHA guidelines. Newer evidence evaluating the use of CCBs to prevent cardiovascular events in
patients with stable coronary artery disease is controversial and remains consistent with the 2002 guidelines.
J Pharm Technol 2006;22:271-80.
THIS ARTICLE IS APPROVED FOR CONTINUING EDUCATION CREDIT
ACPE UNIVERSAL PROGRAM NUMBER: 407-000-06-055-H01 |